My dad reminded me that I'd borrowed a film off of him and the fact that it was the only missing piece of the MCU puzzle for me (outside of the current Spider-Man: Far From Home) coupled with a day off, meant that it was finally time to tackle a film I was slightly dubious about. So join me for another Brucie Bonus as I decided to watch:
CAPTAIN MARVEL (2019 dir. Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck)
Christ, even the cover's boring...
Why I watched it:
As the intro suggested, I'm a big fan of the superhero genre and the MCU in particular. Rarely have they made an out and out bad film and regrettably, this fell in a period where I was hospitalized so it came and went while I was bedridden for over a month. Opting to wait for home release and knowing that my dad would eventually pick it up, he did. I asked to borrow it, he lent it to me and here we are.
Now honestly, I've never been a fan of the character of Captain Marvel, especially the Carol Danvers iteration, so immediately I'm standing on a back foot. But there have been instances where I've been uninterested in a character and then become turned around through the course of the movie, through a mixture of strong storytelling and good performances or simply down to sheer explosive fun (Aquaman, I'm looking at you).
Would this be another case of a pleasant surprise?
The review:
The short answer is no, no it fucking wouldn't.
The reasons then: I don't think in the entire history of superhero films that I have been less invested in a character. Marvel, who so often are great at presenting an origin story decide to forego it essentially to provide us with more action. Perhaps to disguise the fact that Carol Danvers has very little in the way of an origin tale. But where some characters need little introduction and whose origins have been told countless times (Hulk, Spider-Man, Superman, Batman), Carol is a character who NEEDS an origin tale so that the viewer can have some personal attachment.
Instead, we're treated to a patchwork origin tale that tells us very little about Carol Danvers and what kind of person she is because she's suffering from a case of the Bourne Identity. Something's happened, I can't remember it and I can't remember to act human either, ably acted by a constantly moody faced Brie Larson who every time she cracks a wry smile comes across as awkward and unlikeable.
Was I really meant to care about her potential death at the hands of an alien threat if I don't even really know who she is? The problem also lies at Brie Larson who just simply blankly stares through various scenes and through her lack of acting doesn't make me care about her.
I made the same face as I was watching this, a lot...
That's a shame as Captain Marvel boasts an impressive supporting cast involving a typically good Samuel L. Jackson performance and a show-stealing Ben Mendelsohn who is phenomenal in pretty much everything he is in.
What adds to insult is also the casual manner in which they brush over one of the most important events in Marvel history in the death of Captain Marvel (Mar-Vell). Opting to gender change him into Annette Benning and then completely glossing over her death, overshadows the emotional event that was the death of the original Marvel and his passing the mantle on. Here, it's presented as a simple afterthought.
It's clear that this is Marvel's attempt to present a strong female presence in the MCU but while certainly presenting her powers as some of the most powerful in the Marvel universe, this seems to be at the cost of her personality. But there's certainly lashings of painful 'girl power' moments including the use of one of the most toe-curling uses of No Doubt's 'Just A Girl' in cinematic history. Also a song from No Doubt's 'Tragic Kingdom' which contradicts Captain Marvel's attempted 1995 timeline by debuting in 1997...
Adding to the collection?
Fuck off. While nowhere near as painful to watch as Iron Man 2 or Thor: The Dark World, I still took four breaks from watching this, either to pee or eat something just to entertain myself by watching. It's not unwatchable by any stretch but you'd have more fun revisiting any of the other films. A woeful 4.5 out of 10.
Can't wait for the sequel featuring Rainbow Brite Supergirl...
Until next time, I remain,
Matt Major
Wednesday, 31 July 2019
Monday, 29 July 2019
Brucie Bonus - TV1 - The Boys
I, by my own admission, have been a little lax in reviewing the past week. I'm not sure why honestly as the next few films are a doddle to watch but in the case of the next one; Well, nostalgia is a powerful tool and as it's the last of the Z's, might mean that the Z's are whittled down to one in the collection. I'm not spoiling what the next film is, just as I'm not spoiling anything in the following review. It's shiny and new and I managed to catch it on a whim.
THE BOYS (2019 Dev. Eric Kripke)
I think this is the last thing I saw before I blacked out in my hospital bed...
Why I watched it:
Garth Ennis. To elaborate, Garth was a huge part of my growing up when I was moving into more mature comics. X-Men was just becoming way too complicated to follow, DC seemed to be churning out some big new event every three months and killing off my beloved JLI members for kicks and Image weren't quite the indie powerhouse they were yet, still reeling from art over substance.
Wizard had told me about Garth and I missed the boat with Preacher frustratingly at the time (I have gone back and read through that amazing run.) From then on I vowed not to miss his upcoming Punisher series and from then on I became a fan so when The Boys made its appearance, I was sure to hop on too.
What unfurled was this amazing mix of Garth's over the top action and comedy. Taking shots at beloved parodies of established superheroes, The Boys was an absolute blast to read.
Fast forward and I loved the live adaptation of Preacher when it finally hit home media and I just so happened to earn another free 30-day pass to Amazon Prime so at a trim 8 episodes, I gave it go...
The review:
The Boys does deviate a fair amount from Garth's source material. To be honest though the amount of batshit crazy things he and Darick Robertson came up with, I'm surprised something like this ever got made.
The superhero genre in some people's eyes might be getting a tad long in the tooth, I personally love it. This is the tonic for them. A slam-bang festival of dark humour and gore that lampoons the absurdity of some heroes but also delivers a riveting episode by episode format.
I blasted through the first three episodes in one evening and binged the remaining five the following day. Everyone plays their roles perfectly, it's a fantastic outing by Karl Urban, one of the other main reasons why I wanted to watch this as I'm a fan of his work. He shines as Billy Butcher (slightly dodgy accent aside) and really hits hard when he needs to deliver the emotional moments.
To my surprise however, the real MVP is Antony Starr as Homelander, The Boys' answer to Superman. His performance is exceptional, switching from being wonderfully false one moment to being downright chilling the next. He shines in this role and that's not to downplay the other performances in The Boys but he makes a wonderful antagonist.
The debate over whether Rocky III was a better movie than Rocky IV had taken an ugly turn...
Adding to the collection?
Oh god yes. I hope they continue the trend of keeping the series at a tight 8 episodes as I rarely drifted when watching this. I can't wait to see what happens in the next series which thankfully has already been greenlit. The bar has been set high with this series and only hope they can continue. A rock-solid 9 out of 10 as it stands.
Much like Sabrina's hit, 'Boys', you'll be looking for a good time with this...
That was terrible, ignore the bad joke but I hope you give it a try, until next time, I remain,
Matt Major
THE BOYS (2019 Dev. Eric Kripke)
Why I watched it:
Garth Ennis. To elaborate, Garth was a huge part of my growing up when I was moving into more mature comics. X-Men was just becoming way too complicated to follow, DC seemed to be churning out some big new event every three months and killing off my beloved JLI members for kicks and Image weren't quite the indie powerhouse they were yet, still reeling from art over substance.
Wizard had told me about Garth and I missed the boat with Preacher frustratingly at the time (I have gone back and read through that amazing run.) From then on I vowed not to miss his upcoming Punisher series and from then on I became a fan so when The Boys made its appearance, I was sure to hop on too.
What unfurled was this amazing mix of Garth's over the top action and comedy. Taking shots at beloved parodies of established superheroes, The Boys was an absolute blast to read.
Fast forward and I loved the live adaptation of Preacher when it finally hit home media and I just so happened to earn another free 30-day pass to Amazon Prime so at a trim 8 episodes, I gave it go...
The review:
The Boys does deviate a fair amount from Garth's source material. To be honest though the amount of batshit crazy things he and Darick Robertson came up with, I'm surprised something like this ever got made.
The superhero genre in some people's eyes might be getting a tad long in the tooth, I personally love it. This is the tonic for them. A slam-bang festival of dark humour and gore that lampoons the absurdity of some heroes but also delivers a riveting episode by episode format.
I blasted through the first three episodes in one evening and binged the remaining five the following day. Everyone plays their roles perfectly, it's a fantastic outing by Karl Urban, one of the other main reasons why I wanted to watch this as I'm a fan of his work. He shines as Billy Butcher (slightly dodgy accent aside) and really hits hard when he needs to deliver the emotional moments.
To my surprise however, the real MVP is Antony Starr as Homelander, The Boys' answer to Superman. His performance is exceptional, switching from being wonderfully false one moment to being downright chilling the next. He shines in this role and that's not to downplay the other performances in The Boys but he makes a wonderful antagonist.
The debate over whether Rocky III was a better movie than Rocky IV had taken an ugly turn...
Adding to the collection?
Oh god yes. I hope they continue the trend of keeping the series at a tight 8 episodes as I rarely drifted when watching this. I can't wait to see what happens in the next series which thankfully has already been greenlit. The bar has been set high with this series and only hope they can continue. A rock-solid 9 out of 10 as it stands.
Much like Sabrina's hit, 'Boys', you'll be looking for a good time with this...
That was terrible, ignore the bad joke but I hope you give it a try, until next time, I remain,
Matt Major
Friday, 19 July 2019
2. Zodiac
Ok, mixing it up slightly with this entry. It occurred to me that my predictions would be better suited if I did it in real-time, so I'll predict whether today's film is worthy of staying in the collection BEFORE actually watching the darned thing. I'll then write my thoughts after watching said...(checks box) 151 minutes of said film...hoo boy.
No use delaying the inevitable, its time to go back to the first pairing of Tony Stark and Bruce Banner in today's film:
ZODIAC (2007 dir. David Fincher)
Or, 'Attack of the misty bridge' as the DVD cover would suggest...
Why I bought it/Why I liked it:
I'm a bit hazy as to how I came about owning this honestly. The faded CEX sticker suggests I paid the sum of £4.00 or £3.40 thanks to the then CEX discount. for this film. Now I'm a bit of a cheapskate so feasibly I either bought it on a whim where I wanted to watch the latest movies that had come out and I'd miss and would opt if I wanted to keep them there and there. You know, sort of like a precursor to this blog.
The second option was that I really liked this film after giving it a rental from the dearly departed Blockbuster Video (Rest in peace old friend) and watching it with my dad and was happy to shell out the money for it.
The third and less likely option was I was such a huge Robert Downey Jr fan after Kiss Kiss Bang Bang and Iron Man a year later that any work that he did in-between must have been good by my reckoning.
I think option 1 is the winner here most likely...
If I think it'll stay in the collection:
Yeah, actually I think it will. As I recall it has really good acting performances from everyone involved and was a really good thriller. I remember really like Mark Ruffalo's performance, a guy whose films I wasn't familiar with at the time and thing Anthony Edwards is REALLY good in this.
In short, I'm looking forward to revisiting it but that classic Fincher run time might hurt it in the long run. Well enough dilly-dallying, time to put it in the PS4 before the day runs out...
The review:
I don't actually know how long ago it was since I last saw this film but I can honestly say I was as riveted to the screen as I was the first time I watched it.
This clearly is a film about performances and everyone really knocks it out of the park. Jake Gyllenhaal is fantastic as we watch a young bright-eyed innocent cartoonist become chewed up and obsessed over the Zodiac killings. We watch him fall in love and ultimately get divorced throughout the course of the film but the audience wills him on to get to the bottom of a case the police can't close.
Mark chooses his meal for the staff Christmas party...
The police then, Ruffalo and Edwards are again as great as I remembered throughout the film but there are so many great actors that bulk out the rest of the film. A clean-shaven Donal Logue for one, demonstrating why he's the best thing in 'Gotham' by a country mile and other noticeable faces like Elias Koteas and the ever-dependable Brian Cox.
Another fantastic RDJ performance again as boozy journalist Paul Avery whose vices slowly eat him up and his alcoholism gets the best of him. He's like pseudo-Tony!
I love crime thrillers such as these and honestly, Fincher's directing is so seamless, the long run-time didn't feel like a chore at all, easily gliding by as strong performance after strong performance rattled off in front of me. A genuine joy to revisit.
Should it stay or should it go?
Seeing as I've been gushing about it, it's definitely a keeper. It gets a solid 8 out of 10 from me and maybe in hindsight, I shelled out £3.40 because it was so darned good the first time I watched it.
I leave you with a pallid looking Jake enjoying his favourite tipple in the film:
Raise an Aqua Velva in honour of this film. But not the Zodiac Killer...he was a dick....
Until next time, I remain,
Matt Major
No use delaying the inevitable, its time to go back to the first pairing of Tony Stark and Bruce Banner in today's film:
ZODIAC (2007 dir. David Fincher)
Or, 'Attack of the misty bridge' as the DVD cover would suggest...
Why I bought it/Why I liked it:
I'm a bit hazy as to how I came about owning this honestly. The faded CEX sticker suggests I paid the sum of £4.00 or £3.40 thanks to the then CEX discount. for this film. Now I'm a bit of a cheapskate so feasibly I either bought it on a whim where I wanted to watch the latest movies that had come out and I'd miss and would opt if I wanted to keep them there and there. You know, sort of like a precursor to this blog.
The second option was that I really liked this film after giving it a rental from the dearly departed Blockbuster Video (Rest in peace old friend) and watching it with my dad and was happy to shell out the money for it.
The third and less likely option was I was such a huge Robert Downey Jr fan after Kiss Kiss Bang Bang and Iron Man a year later that any work that he did in-between must have been good by my reckoning.
I think option 1 is the winner here most likely...
If I think it'll stay in the collection:
Yeah, actually I think it will. As I recall it has really good acting performances from everyone involved and was a really good thriller. I remember really like Mark Ruffalo's performance, a guy whose films I wasn't familiar with at the time and thing Anthony Edwards is REALLY good in this.
In short, I'm looking forward to revisiting it but that classic Fincher run time might hurt it in the long run. Well enough dilly-dallying, time to put it in the PS4 before the day runs out...
The review:
I don't actually know how long ago it was since I last saw this film but I can honestly say I was as riveted to the screen as I was the first time I watched it.
This clearly is a film about performances and everyone really knocks it out of the park. Jake Gyllenhaal is fantastic as we watch a young bright-eyed innocent cartoonist become chewed up and obsessed over the Zodiac killings. We watch him fall in love and ultimately get divorced throughout the course of the film but the audience wills him on to get to the bottom of a case the police can't close.
Mark chooses his meal for the staff Christmas party...
The police then, Ruffalo and Edwards are again as great as I remembered throughout the film but there are so many great actors that bulk out the rest of the film. A clean-shaven Donal Logue for one, demonstrating why he's the best thing in 'Gotham' by a country mile and other noticeable faces like Elias Koteas and the ever-dependable Brian Cox.
Another fantastic RDJ performance again as boozy journalist Paul Avery whose vices slowly eat him up and his alcoholism gets the best of him. He's like pseudo-Tony!
I love crime thrillers such as these and honestly, Fincher's directing is so seamless, the long run-time didn't feel like a chore at all, easily gliding by as strong performance after strong performance rattled off in front of me. A genuine joy to revisit.
Should it stay or should it go?
Seeing as I've been gushing about it, it's definitely a keeper. It gets a solid 8 out of 10 from me and maybe in hindsight, I shelled out £3.40 because it was so darned good the first time I watched it.
I leave you with a pallid looking Jake enjoying his favourite tipple in the film:
Raise an Aqua Velva in honour of this film. But not the Zodiac Killer...he was a dick....
Until next time, I remain,
Matt Major
Wednesday, 17 July 2019
1. Zoolander
Hi there,
so a little back story to this blog. Essentially its existence is twofold. Firstly, it's an excuse to get me writing in some capacity again and honestly, I thought this format would be quite fun. Secondly and most importantly, it's because as the blog states: I have too many DVDs.
Back up a second, I hear you cry, DVDs? What year do you think it is grandad? Well it's 2019 and sometimes films haven't been released on Blu-Ray yet or sometimes it's just plain cheaper to buy something on DVD. Like a LOT cheaper. The thing is, I always wanted to have a retirement plan which consisted of a comfy chair and an opportunity to watch some of the classics I've accumulated over the years.
But rose-tinted glasses and time can be cruel mistresses and the films that might have blown me away damn near 20 years ago or rolling on the floor may not be the gems I hold in high regard anymore. So it's time to get serious. Revisit every film I own and make a decision. Is it worth keeping or worth trading in for a penny at the local CEX?
Oh and I'm going backwards alphabetically through my collection. It's easier to grab films this way due to my set up and it takes a break from the norm where everyone else might go from numbers or A respectively.
Right, intro's done. Let's get to it. First film being:
ZOOLANDER (2001 Dir. Ben Stiller)
Why I bought it/Why I liked it:
Shortly after my parents divorced in 2000, my dad would make up for lost time by taking me to the cinema a lot. It got to a point where we'd end up watching any new release that would come out that week. As a result, I got to watch a lot of good stuff like Gladiator and Batman Begins but a lot of awful stuff too like The Sum Of All Fears and Collateral Damage. No really, I was like one of the 28 people who probably saw Collateral Damage in the cinema. It haunts me to this day...
The 'Frat Pack' were becoming reliable hands, gaining momentum with each movie and Stiller had started making a name for himself after a bunch of stop/start attempts and mostly being known for playing 'Angry guy' in stuff like Mystery Men and Friends. I mostly bought it because as a 16-year-old, it made me laugh a whole bunch in the cinema and a few years later, working for CEX, it dropped to the paltry sum of £1.50. With my discount, it took a tasty 22p off and in my collection, it would stay.
If I think it'll stay in the collection:
This is probably the best example of revisiting a film and seeing if it holds up today. My estimate is that time won't be kind to Derek Zoolander and chums and it'll feel all early millenium. At a scant 85 minutes, it's not likely to outlive its welcome and might rule in its favour. I'm hoping to get a few laughs from it but knowing all the big gags, I'm not sure if there's much more left the film has in the tank.
The review:
What makes me laugh is that apparently, VH1 is a big thing in the states where over here in the UK, for years it was the channel that played retro music and gave Paul King and Tania Bryer something to do in the early '90s. Apparently, it was responsible for giving us the 'gift' of Derek Zoolander at their fashion awards in a series of short skits. So in true Saturday Night Live spinoff fashion, here's a film with that character.
Now I checked everywhere for a Lorne Michaels credit because it just has that presence like one of the SNL films. His name is nowhere to be seen but this FEELS very much like an SNL spinoff project. Maybe it's the fact that half the cast is part of its alumni but it has that mid 90's to early 2000's aura of one of those comedies.
Part of the fun of Zoolander is spotting the random cameos, Jennifer Coolidge and Vince Vaughn earn easy paydays for not uttering a single word for their roles. You can laugh along and remember when names such as Victoria Beckham, Christian Slater, Cuba Gooding Jr and Billy Zane were still NAMES back in 2001. You can awww as sweet little Natalie Portman is still young (do not insert inappropriate Moby joke here....) and hadn't made atrocities with Hayden Christensen or Ashton Kutcher - History's Greatest Monster yet.
The film, however, is a one-note joke, it's essentially Ben Stiller making a face for 85 minutes, it is this face:
You now have essentially watched the movie.
Taking shots at the fashion industry is pretty much like shooting fish in a barrel. We know they're mainly mimbo's and bimbo's and the one's who aren't, attempt to push their latest charity venture down our throats and claim to be authorities on the subject because they've been to Africa a couple of times.
There are high points in the film. Milla Jovovich is shockingly good AND expressive throughout the film, something she so rarely does when given her own starring vehicle. No really, look!
She scowls and pouts like a pro.
Jerry Stiller plays classic Jerry Stiller and shows what an old pro he is by making the most out of his role and there's a funny Garry Shandling cameo, may he rest in peace.
By the time a mobile phone gag comes though (they WERE getting smaller, that's very funny...) something hit me that I hadn't noticed before. The plot, as thin as it is, is essentially The Naked Gun's brainwashing theme all over again. The Naked Gun has more classic gags in it throughout though where I sadly only laughed out loud once upon this repeated viewing...
Should it stay or should it go?
Zoolander is going on the trade pile. It's not an awful waste of 85 minutes but 18 years haven't been kind to it as the attempt at a sequel and cartoon series have proven. It gets a mediocre 5.5 out of 10.
If you're interested, you can find it for 50p or less now in your local charity shop or CEX. You can also learn how to make your own Orange Mocha Frappucino here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exe_I-tnxpU
Until next time, I remain,
Matt Major.
so a little back story to this blog. Essentially its existence is twofold. Firstly, it's an excuse to get me writing in some capacity again and honestly, I thought this format would be quite fun. Secondly and most importantly, it's because as the blog states: I have too many DVDs.
Back up a second, I hear you cry, DVDs? What year do you think it is grandad? Well it's 2019 and sometimes films haven't been released on Blu-Ray yet or sometimes it's just plain cheaper to buy something on DVD. Like a LOT cheaper. The thing is, I always wanted to have a retirement plan which consisted of a comfy chair and an opportunity to watch some of the classics I've accumulated over the years.
But rose-tinted glasses and time can be cruel mistresses and the films that might have blown me away damn near 20 years ago or rolling on the floor may not be the gems I hold in high regard anymore. So it's time to get serious. Revisit every film I own and make a decision. Is it worth keeping or worth trading in for a penny at the local CEX?
Oh and I'm going backwards alphabetically through my collection. It's easier to grab films this way due to my set up and it takes a break from the norm where everyone else might go from numbers or A respectively.
Right, intro's done. Let's get to it. First film being:
ZOOLANDER (2001 Dir. Ben Stiller)
Shortly after my parents divorced in 2000, my dad would make up for lost time by taking me to the cinema a lot. It got to a point where we'd end up watching any new release that would come out that week. As a result, I got to watch a lot of good stuff like Gladiator and Batman Begins but a lot of awful stuff too like The Sum Of All Fears and Collateral Damage. No really, I was like one of the 28 people who probably saw Collateral Damage in the cinema. It haunts me to this day...
The 'Frat Pack' were becoming reliable hands, gaining momentum with each movie and Stiller had started making a name for himself after a bunch of stop/start attempts and mostly being known for playing 'Angry guy' in stuff like Mystery Men and Friends. I mostly bought it because as a 16-year-old, it made me laugh a whole bunch in the cinema and a few years later, working for CEX, it dropped to the paltry sum of £1.50. With my discount, it took a tasty 22p off and in my collection, it would stay.
If I think it'll stay in the collection:
This is probably the best example of revisiting a film and seeing if it holds up today. My estimate is that time won't be kind to Derek Zoolander and chums and it'll feel all early millenium. At a scant 85 minutes, it's not likely to outlive its welcome and might rule in its favour. I'm hoping to get a few laughs from it but knowing all the big gags, I'm not sure if there's much more left the film has in the tank.
The review:
What makes me laugh is that apparently, VH1 is a big thing in the states where over here in the UK, for years it was the channel that played retro music and gave Paul King and Tania Bryer something to do in the early '90s. Apparently, it was responsible for giving us the 'gift' of Derek Zoolander at their fashion awards in a series of short skits. So in true Saturday Night Live spinoff fashion, here's a film with that character.
Now I checked everywhere for a Lorne Michaels credit because it just has that presence like one of the SNL films. His name is nowhere to be seen but this FEELS very much like an SNL spinoff project. Maybe it's the fact that half the cast is part of its alumni but it has that mid 90's to early 2000's aura of one of those comedies.
Part of the fun of Zoolander is spotting the random cameos, Jennifer Coolidge and Vince Vaughn earn easy paydays for not uttering a single word for their roles. You can laugh along and remember when names such as Victoria Beckham, Christian Slater, Cuba Gooding Jr and Billy Zane were still NAMES back in 2001. You can awww as sweet little Natalie Portman is still young (do not insert inappropriate Moby joke here....) and hadn't made atrocities with Hayden Christensen or Ashton Kutcher - History's Greatest Monster yet.
The film, however, is a one-note joke, it's essentially Ben Stiller making a face for 85 minutes, it is this face:
You now have essentially watched the movie.
Taking shots at the fashion industry is pretty much like shooting fish in a barrel. We know they're mainly mimbo's and bimbo's and the one's who aren't, attempt to push their latest charity venture down our throats and claim to be authorities on the subject because they've been to Africa a couple of times.
There are high points in the film. Milla Jovovich is shockingly good AND expressive throughout the film, something she so rarely does when given her own starring vehicle. No really, look!
She scowls and pouts like a pro.
Jerry Stiller plays classic Jerry Stiller and shows what an old pro he is by making the most out of his role and there's a funny Garry Shandling cameo, may he rest in peace.
By the time a mobile phone gag comes though (they WERE getting smaller, that's very funny...) something hit me that I hadn't noticed before. The plot, as thin as it is, is essentially The Naked Gun's brainwashing theme all over again. The Naked Gun has more classic gags in it throughout though where I sadly only laughed out loud once upon this repeated viewing...
Should it stay or should it go?
Zoolander is going on the trade pile. It's not an awful waste of 85 minutes but 18 years haven't been kind to it as the attempt at a sequel and cartoon series have proven. It gets a mediocre 5.5 out of 10.
If you're interested, you can find it for 50p or less now in your local charity shop or CEX. You can also learn how to make your own Orange Mocha Frappucino here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exe_I-tnxpU
Until next time, I remain,
Matt Major.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)